<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>[Lowerbounds, Upperbounds] &#187; Combinatorics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://magic.aladdin.cs.cmu.edu/category/mathematics/combinatorics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://magic.aladdin.cs.cmu.edu</link>
	<description>Algorithms are everywhere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:58:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9-rare</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>An Annoying Combinatorial Problem</title>
		<link>http://magic.aladdin.cs.cmu.edu/2005/05/05/an-annoying-combinatorial-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://magic.aladdin.cs.cmu.edu/2005/05/05/an-annoying-combinatorial-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2005 03:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oleg Pikhurko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Combinatorics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Problems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://magic.aladdin.cs.cmu.edu/2005/05/05/an-annoying-combinatorial-problem/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is an &#8220;innocent&#8221; combinatorial problem, with the best known bounds being very simple (but nobody managed to improve them since 1978). Disclaimer: the problem is very catchy (I struggled with it for quite a while), so do not read any further if, for example, you are writing a PhD thesis   
Maker and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is an &#8220;innocent&#8221; combinatorial problem, with the best known bounds being very simple (but nobody managed to improve them since 1978). Disclaimer: the problem is very catchy (I struggled with it for quite a while), so do not read any further if, for example, you are writing a PhD thesis <img src='http://magic.aladdin.cs.cmu.edu/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Maker and Breaker alternatively select 1 and q edges of K_n (the complete graph on n vertices) until all edges have been claimed. Maker wins if his graph has a triangle. What is the smallest q=q(n) such that Breaker has a winning strategy?</p>
<p>The best known strategy for Maker is to claim edges incident to some vertex x (and never miss a one-step win). If Breaker managed to block x completely, say after m rounds, then Breaker made n-1-m + {m\choose 2}\le m q(n) moves. This implies that q(n) is approximately at least \sqrt{2n}.</p>
<p>On the other hand, Breaker can win if q> 2\sqrt{n}: for each edge xy claimed by Maker, Breaker selects \sqrt{n} edges at x and \sqrt{n} edges at y. Thus Maker&#8217;s graph has maximum degree at most (n-1)/\sqrt{n}+1 and Breaker can always block all immediate threats.</p>
<p>Reference: V.Chvatal and P.Erdos, Biased positional games, Ann. Discrete Math. 2 (1978), 221-229.</p>
<p>I would bet on the \sqrt{2n} bound <img src='http://magic.aladdin.cs.cmu.edu/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Oleg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://magic.aladdin.cs.cmu.edu/2005/05/05/an-annoying-combinatorial-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
